[LMH]change in Makefile
James A. Crippen
Mon Apr 29 18:49:01 2002
Nyef <email@example.com> writes:
> On 29 Apr 2002, James A. Crippen wrote:
> > There's no easy way to make this sort of stuff portable without going
> > to autoconf and automake. Which I don't think we're ready for yet.
> > I've committed a patch to e3/Makefile that adds an $(INCLUDES)
> > variable and uses this var in the depend target. Didn't use it on the
> > .cc.o target because it doesn't seem to be necessary (ie, GCC figures
> > this out on its own).
> James, I know you suggested this yourself at one point, but what about
> switching from makedepend to gcc -MM? It's a lot more likely to just plain
> work without these sorts of hassles.
I think there is resistance since not everybody might be using GCC.
Of course, the problem here is how to make the makefile smart enough
to decide whether to use 'gcc -MM' or 'makedepend' depending on what's
We're getting to the point of needing autoconf and automake, as I
said before. I'd just rather not make that step yet if possible,
mostly because it would clutter things up.
James A. Crippen <firstname.lastname@example.org> ,-./-. Anchorage, Alaska,
Lambda Unlimited: Recursion 'R' Us | |/ | USA, 61.20939N, -149.767W
Y = \f.(\x.f(xx)) (\x.f(xx)) | |\ | Earth, Sol System,
Y(F) = F(Y(F)) \_,-_/ Milky Way.