[LMH]Re: CATCH/THROW?
Steve Krueger
stevelisp@grape-krueger.com
Thu Jul 24 17:57:01 2003
Yes, I did remember the VM1 catch/throw/unwind-protect. Sorry. That's
what I get for giving a quick answer off the top of my head instead of
cracking the manuals.
The description of catch/throw/etc. in SSDN2 is actually quite good.
Allastair, do you think you could send a disassembly of the function in
question. Maybe we can work out the actions of %unwind-protect-continue
and %unwind-protect-cleanup by looking at how they are used in the function.
-Steve
Paul Fuqua wrote:
> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 23:04:42 -0500
> From: Steve Krueger <s-krueger@sbcglobal.net>
>
> I think catch/throw/unwind-protect is an area that changed somewhat in
> VM2 because the call frame changed.
>
>A lot, actually. We divorced catch/throw from call/return, though both
>use the stack.
>
> A catch is an open (in progress and not yet called) frame on the stack
> with the function being a special UCODE-ENTRY.
>
>Um, that's VM1, not VM2. (VM2 doesn't have open frames.)
>
>